<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>steven n fettig&apos;s Jitterin&apos; Thoughts</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008-09-13:/mythoughts//1</id>
    <updated>2008-11-05T14:10:22Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Thoughts related to anything that comes to mind -- tempered by love from my wife and a LOT of caffeine.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.21-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Two things that have made me happy about this election</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/001097.php" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008:/mythoughts//1.1097</id>
    <entryid>1097</entryid>

    <published>2008-11-05T14:14:16Z</published>
    <updated>2008-11-05T14:10:22Z</updated>

    <summary>I have loathed the 2008 election to no end. It started way too early and has been a pissing match mostly between people whose interest is only furthering a governmental agenda and not ensuring the freedom (and subsequent responsibility) of the people. As I commented on Twitter this morning: &quot;I&apos;m...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>steven n fettig</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="National Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have loathed the 2008 election to no end. It started way too early and has been a pissing match mostly between people whose interest is only furthering a governmental agenda and not ensuring the freedom (and subsequent responsibility) of the people. As I commented on Twitter this morning: "I'm from the government and I'm here to help you..." Regardless of which party (i.e. Democrat or Republican), that is what you were casting a vote for. I didn't want either candidate to win, so I can't really say that I'm <em>more</em> disappointed in Obama winning. I'm disappointed in both parties and that is it.</p>
<p>The flip side to this story is that of two events that have truly made me smile. The first is a simple one: people voted... and a lot of them. (I'm sure there were plenty of duplicate and dead voters, but I guess no system is perfect.) I've always been raked over the coals by my German friends at the lack of voter turnout in our presidential elections. Thank you American friends for actually going to vote! Now I have something to brag about. Sure, we could do better than 60% (I hope the real numbers - once all of the votes are counted - are higher), but that is pretty amazing, considering I've read that turnout has been as low as 30% in the past few decades. And that's just sad... So, despite having to chose between two left leaning senators, I'm happy people tried to make the choice.</p>
<p>The second thing that really, truly made me smile was this: A. voted. I gave an employee (who is a contemporary) shit yesterday because I heard him say that he doesn't vote. I badgered him ... I even offered money ... not to vote a particular way, but to simply vote. I really didn't think much of it. I thought he'd take his raspberries and shake them off. This morning I was left with the following note on my desk:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>"Steve,</p>

<p>  <p>Here's your sticker buddy, and if you need any questions answered ask away!</p></p>

<p>  <p>For real - I just wanna say thanks for pushing me to vote. I never had in my life, so I just felt a 'lil weird. Now that I have, it felt pretty good. So, for it being my first time I just wanna' say thank you.</p></p>

<p>  <p>A.</p></p>

<p>  <p>And it really wasn't hard at all &amp; only took 5 min of my time!"</p><br />
</blockquote><br />
<p>If that's all it takes to get people out to vote, I should have given <em>everyone</em> in the shop a hard time... That would have been at least 100 more people at the polls. There's always next election.</p><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>100 Free (as in beer) copies of &quot;Ever Wonder Why? And Other Controversial Essays&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/001096.php" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008:/mythoughts//1.1096</id>
    <entryid>1096</entryid>

    <published>2008-10-04T13:08:06Z</published>
    <updated>2008-10-04T13:04:46Z</updated>

    <summary>
business</summary>
    <author>
        <name>steven n fettig</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Local Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="National Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="books read/reading" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="lifeGeneral" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I started reading economic and political rags around the time I turned 12. It was an early interest in a wide range of topics that eventually landed me in the hands of Dr. Thomas Sowell over 18 years ago. The first article of his that I read was published in Forbes Magazine (and I still have a copy somewhere buried in my basement). From the first paragraph on, I have been fascinated with Dr. Sowell's insight and narrative style. I wish more people would read his works... Even if you were limited to two articles a year, you would be much more educated and <em>wise</em> from heeding his commentary.</p>
<p>I realized that while it would be illegal for me to try to post his articles in whole on my weblog (besides screw him out of the deserved royalties from his work), I realized that I <em>can</em> do <em>something</em>. One of his more recent books, <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Ever-Wonder-Other-Controversial-Essays/dp/0817947523/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1223125515&amp;sr=8-1">Ever Wonder Why? And Other Controversial Essays</a>,</em> (click the link to go to Amazon and see what it is about) is an quick and easy read - and is really a compilation of a bunch of articles that made me look forward to his articles so many years ago. So, here's the deal. I know there are all of four of you who read my blog... but perhaps we can start a mini reading revolution at that. I want to give away 100 copies of Dr. Sowell's book. In order to get your <em>free</em> (shipping and all) copy, all you need to do is write me at <a href="mailto:snfettig@gmail.com">snfettig@gmail.com</a> with "Free Sowell Book" in the subject line and your FULL address in the body of the email. That is all you need to do. You don't even need to say hi. Just send me an email with that information. (Oh... and I sincerely promise that I will NOT give away any of your address information. Frankly, I don't have the time nor energy to do anything with it other than send out the books.)</p>
<p>If this works out, I'll give away 500 more copies over the course of the remaining portion of this year and next year. I will keep track of the numbers given away here. I might be embarrassed and find that <em>no one</em> requests a copy. How unfortunate would that be? We'll see.</p>
]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Some of life&apos;s sweetest experiences are the hardest.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/001095.php" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008:/mythoughts//1.1095</id>
    <entryid>1095</entryid>

    <published>2008-10-01T15:14:43Z</published>
    <updated>2008-10-01T17:12:55Z</updated>

    <summary>On Sunday I partook in what is my last planned triathlon for 2008. My season started in June this year and has ended with the most brutal race I have ever experienced or can imagine doing again. The Las Vegas 2008 triathlon took place at Lake Mead, 23 miles north...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>steven n fettig</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="travel" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="{tri}Training" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/">
        <![CDATA[<p>On Sunday I partook in what is my last planned triathlon for 2008. My season started in June this year and has ended with the most brutal race I have ever experienced or can imagine doing again.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.mountainmanevents.com/lasvegastriathlon.htm">Las Vegas 2008</a> triathlon took place at Lake Mead, 23 miles north of the Strip in Las Vegas - just outside of Boulder City, Nevada. I made final preparations for the trip back in June after looking around for a more remote race than I had done up until that point. Prior to this trip, the furthest I had gone for a race was Grand Haven, Michigan - about 150 miles (as the crow flies) from where I live. I'm not really sure what it was that made Las Vegas pop out at me when I was looking through USAT's sanctioned triathlons for 2008. It was probably the simple fact that the idea of being able to go out and party the night after my last triathlon for the year was an inviting thought. While my mind was on the potential for fun afterwards, I had no clue what type of event awaited me.</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The website for the triathlon boasts the "flattest course in Las Vegas." HA! This must be a joke... a very funny one directed at those who are clueless about the terrain surrounding Lake Mead. The double HA! comes in when you couple the terrain with the temperature. Sure... many of you runners apparently don't mind 95 degrees. Heck, I didn't think I minded running in 95 degrees. The problem is that 95 deg. in Wisconsin is totally different than the 95 deg. you experience in the desert surrounding Lake Mead. For one, my little corner of Wisconsin is covered in trees - especially along the roads. Sure, we have a lot of farmland, but in most of the areas where one can run, there is intermittent shade provided by the nearby trees. They apparently forgot to plant trees around Lake Mead. Plus, I will never, ever again put any credence in the idea that 95 deg. dry heat is more bearable than 95 deg. humid heat. Bullshit. There are two sides to that coin. The dry heat may make you think it isn't has warm out, but then again, you would be wrong. Plus, the speed at which you dehydrate in the desert heat is much faster than if you run in 95 deg. weather at 40% humidity. The fact is that I train in "our" heat and not theirs. Theirs is different and it made my run miserable. Well, that's not entirely accurate. Couple the constant inclines for the first three miles with the heat, and my run was a miserable one. And that was the crux of my problem: the bike and run involved overcoming 2-5% grades (with a nice mile long 8% grade hill thrown in the bike leg). Whatever the organizers mean by the "flattest course in Las Vegas" is lost on me. Perhaps they meant the swim. Yes. The swim was definitely flat. In fact, the swim was amazing. The water was calm and a balmy 78 deg. I wore my wetsuit because a) I was allowed to per USAT rules and when they measured the water temp. and b) I hadn't been in the water for 7 weeks prior to the event and needed every extra bit of buoyancy I could muster (naturally or not). Frankly, the swim was awesome and even though I struggled, I enjoyed every minute of it.</p>
<p>So, after all that whining above, you must think I hated the course and would never do it again. WRONG. I can say hands down that the Las Vegas Triathlon is one of the best courses I have ever done. The scenery was amazing and despite my personal troubles with the course, it was a ton of fun. And I would do it again next week, if I could. The fact is that I was very poorly prepared for this race. Besides having had a continual decline in my training over the past two months - between work, travel and being sick, I struggled to keep a coherent training schedule together - I really had no idea what I was getting myself into. In the end, I learned a lot.</p>
<p>First, the race was extremely remote; meaning I had to fly with all of my gear and figure my way around that hassle. (Oddly enough, the experience at the airport - both in Milwaukee and Las Vegas - was extremely smooth. Even though the Thule Bike Carrier I used looks huge and awkward, it packs easily and was straight-forward to check in.) It is also expensive to fly with a bike. For domestic flying (i.e. within the US), plan on paying at least $160 round-trip for your bike, on top of the normal ticket cost. In a few weeks, Steph and I will be heading to Germany and I'm taking my other bike with to the tune of $300 for round-trip. We'll see whether or not I ride enough to make it worth the cost...</p>
<br />
<p>Second, I had no idea what to expect from the terrain. I really did think the course would be flat. There are courses described as "hilly" around us that would be flat as a board in comparison to this course. Between the lack of training and the never-ending inclines, it made the race very, very difficult for me.</p>
<br />
<p>So, how did I do? I have no idea. I really don't know what my final time was. I did ok on the swim and bike, but blew the run. I had to walk at least two of the six miles. I am thoroughly embarrassed to even write that. I know my time was nowhere close to what my first Olympic distance event came out to be. Between the heat and the terrain of the bike leg, I was simply spent when I hit the run. The sun had also come out in full-force about a 1/4 of the way into the bike leg. I had no experience to deal with it physically and mentally and it took its toll on me. After the exposure to that type of course, I know much better what to expect.</p>
<br />
<p>The last comment I want to make is that the organizers of the course deserve a huge amount of credit. The packet pickup sessions went very smoothly and they did a great job of trying to explain the course and what we should expect. They did a good job marking the course and controlling things like car traffic. I simply liked the character and personality of the participants, organizers and volunteers. They all deserve a great deal of praise and appreciation. Despite having my worst race ever (yet), I had a great time. I can't wait to do it again.</p><br />
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>A comment on &quot;The moral imbalance of bailouts&quot; (by Jeff Jarvis)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/001094.php" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008:/mythoughts//1.1094</id>
    <entryid>1094</entryid>

    <published>2008-09-23T14:08:58Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-23T14:05:40Z</updated>

    <summary>
business</summary>
    <author>
        <name>steven n fettig</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="National Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Thoughts &apos;n Rants" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="links-of-interest" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't understand Jarvis's statement:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>"I believe in the market but I also believe that the government must decide when to regulate it just enough. (That is the essence of why I am a Democrat.)" (<a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/09/19/the-moral-imbalance-of-bailouts/">The moral imbalance of bailouts</a>)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>My personal understanding of a general Democrats' opinion is that there is <strong>rarely</strong> a reason <strong>not</strong> to involve the government in our lives as long as it passes the litmus test of "helping" a given segment of the population. And this is exactly what makes me <strong>not</strong> a Democrat (and these days, less and less of a Republican).</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't believe that the government can do <strong>anything</strong> long term to <em>help</em> a given segment of the population. By making centralized choices over the value one group (purportedly) offers vs. another, you take away the basic freedoms <strong>and</strong> <em>responsibilities</em> we are afforded through our Constitution. Imbalances in markets and social systems are created that are catastrophic; much the same way the current financial turmoil is caused by this imbalance. At the end of the day, the derivative insurance market (for insuring default on loans) has led to the chain reaction burning the foundations away from large investment firms and banks. But, at the beginning of this chain reaction is the opinion of a "little known" Democrat - Andrew Cuomo, then as Pres. Clinton's HUD Secretary - who thought <strong>everyone</strong> should have access to loans to buy homes - even if they couldn't afford it in traditional terms (i.e. 20% down-payment and steady income). By setting up this perverse system whereby the most risky of mortgages/loans (i.e. those that showed a high likelihood of default) would be backed and "insured" by the government, we were creating an incentive for banks to loan money to people they shouldn't have and for people who shouldn't be provided credit be given <strong>a lot</strong> of it. So, while not the entire reason for our current dilemma, it is the typical political (both Democrat <strong>and</strong> Republican) interventionism that led to this mess - greed of the assholes who where trying to make a quick, and very big, buck from this tidy little loophole, notwithstanding. As they say, no good deed goes unpunished.</p>
<p>I had to make a commentary on Jeff's post because the rest of it is dead-on, in my opinion. He said it first and said it better than I could have:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>"The problem for those left holding the bag - us - is that we have no leverage ourselves to demand conditions in return for our involuntarily generous rescue."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>How generous of our Congress and President (and associated agencies) to hand out our and our kid's money to help the misdeeds of today's idiots (businessmen and politicians equally).</p>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>AIG and Regulation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/001090.php" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008:/mythoughts//1.1090</id>
    <entryid>1090</entryid>

    <published>2008-09-19T03:12:12Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-19T03:17:14Z</updated>

    <summary>The past few days have been so depressing for me. Every time I opened a browser to peruse the news, my heart sank deeper and deeper. Article after article has been written about the current financial turmoil and a very, very small minority have shown the author to have any...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>steven n fettig</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="National Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="links-of-interest" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="business2008financialturmoilregulationgovernmenteconomics" label="business 2008+financial+turmoil regulation government economics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The past few days have been so depressing for me. Every time I opened a browser to peruse the news, my heart sank deeper and deeper. Article after article has been written about the current financial turmoil and a very, very small minority have shown the author to have <em>any</em> understanding of basic economics and the interaction between markets and government regulations. I haven't been over to the <a href="http://www.wsj.com/">Wall Street Journal</a> for some time. No reason in particular... I sometimes lose interest in writing in the WSJ because it has slowly degraded in quality over the past two decades. (I started reading the WSJ and <a href="http://www.economist.com/">Economist</a> when I was twelve. Soon after, I added a number of university review magazines that I found at Barnes and Noble and other financial mags that I was able to get my hands on. I have continued to read many of these over the years and the <em>only</em> publication that seems to have kept up the quality of writing and reporting - i.e. how good the writing itself is and how thorough the reporting is - is the Economist. I guess I should add that I started reading <a href="http://reason.com/">Reason Magazine</a> 10 years ago and [thankfully] haven't seen a decline there, either.)</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>I digress. The news has been thoroughly depressing; not because of the market ruckus - that is to be expected after 10 years of real estate sales insanity - but because the reporting has been so sensational and poorly researched. So, as I said above, I happened to find myself looking through the WSJ and came upon this gem: <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122169320421449849.html">Bad Accounting Rules Helped Sink AIG</a></em> by Zachary Karabell<em>.</em> At the end of the article, he writes:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>"There is one final irony: AIG was founded in Shanghai in 1919, when China was emerging from millennia of imperial rule. Over the next century, China turned away from capitalism. Almost 90 years later, AIG is now being taken over by the U.S. government just as the Chinese government is moving as quickly as possible to divest itself of control of major companies. One of those countries is growing fast; one isn't. Perhaps that is a coincidence; perhaps not."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Please, please read the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122169320421449849.html">article</a>. This is not a g<em>overnment sucks the blood out of every free market</em> article and this is not <em>a business is nothing but a stick it to the man enterprise</em> article either. Mr. Karabell does a fantastic job at explaining the complex reasons why what we are seeing with financial <em>institutions</em> is occurring so rapidly. He also deserves praise for thoughtfully cautioning the <em>way</em> we are dealing with the current problem. The underlying message: watch out for all those unintended consequences.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Why I believe in Perseverance with difficult business ventures</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/001089.php" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008:/mythoughts//1.1089</id>
    <entryid>1089</entryid>

    <published>2008-09-17T03:16:24Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-17T05:20:06Z</updated>

    <summary>At times I feel like there are eyes on me wondering why I don&apos;t walk away from a business that will (obviously and/or likely) never make me rich or famous. Besides the various hobbies I try to enjoy (photography, writing and training for triathlons), spending time with my wife, and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>steven n fettig</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="lifeGeneral" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/">
        <![CDATA[<p>At times I feel like there are eyes on me wondering why I don't walk away from a business that will (obviously and/or likely) never make me rich or famous. Besides the various hobbies I try to enjoy (photography, writing and training for triathlons), spending time with my wife, and the time required behind my desk at work, you would think that pursuing a business venture that has many limitations and a number of responsibilities would be senseless. I argue that sometimes none of this matters when you really enjoy a given pursuit. Sure, I like to complain about the costs of doing business, the customer whose expectations are unreasonable, the fact that I have better things to do with my time, and the possibility that I may find myself financially on the hook for expenses not covered by what is charged. At the end of the day, though, I have learned things through my side business activities that I never would have learned by focusing solely on my day job. Sometimes you do things because you like them. Sometimes you do things because you have to. Sometimes you do things, though, because you can learn from them. Here is what I have learned so far:</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>● Being in business with someone else requires that you know a lot about their character and capabilities. When it comes to picking business peers (or partners) - i.e. those who share in your responsibilities - I have failed miserably. Every person I have worked with (and I'm not referring to co-workers at work or subordinates - or even bosses - I'm referring to peers; those who share my responsibilities) has taken a completely different approach than I have in their approach to long-term business goals, management of resources, and choice in customers. The issue of customer base is a particularly sticky issue because I have had partners in businesses from which I didn't expect to provide a significant source of income, who had another agenda, so while I was very conservative in customer choices and investment required for said customers, they weren't [necessarily] (and understandably so). So, having similar and explicit goals is a necessary topic of conversation. When they don't converge, expect problems to begin.</p>
<p>● Regardless of the customer issue, the other fact remains that peers and partners are good when you are willing to subordinate yourself to their efforts or be able to offer significant technical help to their efforts. Otherwise, you must lead. In business, as in most situations, team efforts do not work often enough to pay off, so you are better off managing or be managed. People equate <em>team effort</em> with time and effort investments being applied equally among all involved with each participant having an equal vote or equal say. Nonsense. This is a recipe for disaster. If this were a successful approach, teams wouldn't have coaches, captains, or managers. In other words, they wouldn't have a specific leader for a specific function and responsibility.</p>
<p>● Time is the most valued commodity you have. You usually think that money is, but in many ways, money is irrelevant when you haven't spent your time wisely. This can be best expressed with my dad's favorite mantra: <em>do it right the first time</em>. Oh, those are words to live by. I have spent more money than I can begin to count fixing problems that were created because I didn't take the time to do things correctly the first time around. If you don't have the time, or ability, to manage your time efficiently for your endeavor, give it up. This commitment is more than one to the potential for financial reward. Time mismanaged is disastrous, so take and realize its use seriously.</p>
<p>● Financial reward is usually slow in coming and flows from sources you least expect. In our manufacturing enterprises, some of the most rewarding business relationships have been from customers that didn't appear to offer a "pie in the sky" financial windfall, but their business has helped us keep the lights on and pay the rent. As tedious as some of those types of relationships are (whether because of hand holding or responding to oddball support requests), they often endure the test of time and provide the cornerstone to your firm's financial success. There are a lot of ridiculous business deals that can make you a lot of money, but with that ridiculousness comes the likely demise of their or your success over the long run and without a conservative, but solid, source of income, you won't survive long term.</p>
<p>All that being said, after eight years, I continue to engage in a commodity hosting business because I like to. Up until now, I have come out slightly behind on the venture (it has also taken the form of four different businesses). From the statements above, however, I'm going to start taking my own advice and learn from my experiences. The first thing I'm going to do is start managing my time - i.e. create to-do lists and stick to them. One of the worst mistakes I have made is not sticking to a plan and finishing work I start.</p>
<p>I no longer have a partner, so the issue of delegation or subordination is settled. It is either me or someone doing the work I want/need them to do. No sharing in things to the end like bestest friends. If this fails, it will be because of my mismanagement or mistakes.</p>
<p>The last thing is the most important. I'm going to keep at it because I enjoy it. At the very core of this post is my wish to convey the reason why you should do anything: because it makes you happy. I think that the biggest successes are from those things you pursue that give you some real and tangible sense of satisfaction. For this reason, I shall try and persevere.</p>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Late night / early morning Envy; Raw thought blogging</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/001088.php" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008:/mythoughts//1.1088</id>
    <entryid>1088</entryid>

    <published>2008-09-15T06:17:04Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-15T06:30:44Z</updated>

    <summary>This could have just as easily been a series of tweets, but I wanted to show you that I&apos;m thinking about writing all the time: I envy those professionals out there who can say what they think, print it (i.e. blog it) and live with the consequences. Perhaps because what...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>steven n fettig</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Thoughts &apos;n Rants" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This could have just as easily been a series of <a href="http://twitter.com/snfettig/">tweets</a>, but I wanted to show you that I'm thinking about writing all the time:</p>
<p>I envy those professionals out there who can say what they think, print it (i.e. blog it) and live with the consequences. Perhaps because what they say is so provocative, their business, notoriety and wealth grow because of it. Maybe it doesn't. Only they know the truth. At first glance, though, they say <em>it</em> like they have nothing to lose and as a reader, you likely believe them.<br /></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>At 1 am, I really, <em>really</em> envy that type of individual - because if you're still up at 1 am and have to be awake in less than 6 hours (when you're a 8+ hrs of sleep per night kind of guy), you usually have a lot of odd and eclectic thoughts running through your head.</p>
<p>Writing what you want and accepting the consequences means the following for me:</p>
<p>- Losing a job you were hoping for because your potential employer found a scary outburst on your blog from your college days.<br />
- Losing the respect of people who are so used to you leaning right, they can't believe that sometimes you lean down or - <em>gasp</em> - even up!<br />
- Being forced out of something you enjoy because your opinions aren't necessarily those of the entity or organization that supports you or would otherwise let you in.</p>
<p>Sometimes I think Consequence Free Writing™ is like getting that wonderfully artistic piece if skin art (vulgar: tattoo) that becomes a soup of embarrassing colors when you are 80. There is no such thing as <em>consequence free</em> anything.</p>
<p>Regardless, at 1 am, I truly envy those who partake in such activities. Then again, at 1 am, I'm not sure that even <em>I</em> want to know my own thoughts...</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Nothing to see here... 2008-09-13</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/001087.php" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008:/mythoughts//1.1087</id>
    <entryid>1087</entryid>

    <published>2008-09-13T16:51:21Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-13T16:57:35Z</updated>

    <summary>I busted my MT installation and now I am working to figure out what I busted. How frustrating....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>steven n fettig</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="weblogging" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I busted my MT installation and now I am working to figure out <em>what</em> I busted. How frustrating.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Action Streams basics with Movable Type (Open Source)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/000750.php" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008:/mythoughts//1.750</id>
    <entryid>750</entryid>

    <published>2008-09-13T00:54:20Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-13T00:54:36Z</updated>

    <summary>Perhaps in some time, this will become more of a howto, but for now, I am trying to take public notes on how I finally got Action Streams working in the manner I had originally intended all the way back in May of this year. I called up my buddy,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>steven n fettig</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="techGeneral" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="weblogging" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Perhaps in some time, this will become more of a howto, but for now, I am trying to take public notes on how I finally got <a href="http://plugins.movabletype.org/action-streams/">Action Streams</a> working in the manner I had originally intended all the way back in May of this year. I called up my buddy, Aaron over at <a href="http://601am.com/">601am.com</a> and asked how I can do better at integrating some of my social network streams into my regular weblog. I've found <a href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter</a> amazingly handy, along with with a host of other social network services. I had originally hoped that my blog could be my own source of these "services," but that would be missing the social component, which I have come to enjoy (for example, trading or showing off photos on <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/stevenfettig/">Flickr</a> and sharing bookmarks on <a href="http://delicous.com/snfettig/">Delicious</a>). Instead of linking everywhere outward, why not integrate the streams created by each of these services within my own blog stream? Action Streams allows you to essentially re-stream your created content within Movable Type. How it does it is still somewhat of a mystery (I just recently dove a bit into the code and am thoroughly confused), but here were my objectives: for every service I want to integrate, I want to publish it, either on my main blog page or in a concentrated form of my output in a blog and stream mixed page. For longer items, such as my blog entries, I need to start breaking them apart into multi-part entries like I had done in the beginning vis a vis extended entries. For the social networking items like those submitted to Delicious, Flickr, and twitter, there is really nothing more than publishing things as is because they are short by their very nature.</p>
<p>The easy part is installing Action Streams. Download, unzip, copy items to the correct location within your Movable Type installation directory. The difficult part follows, as the documentation is practically nonexistent. Here is what I did, though:</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>I first started with the README.txt that comes with Action Streams. Here, Mark, provides the basic installation instructions and some templating information. I haven't used Movable Type tags in years and was a bit confused by the new tag style (&lt;mt:TagName&gt; vs. &lt;MTTagName&gt;), but got over that quickly. Instead of trying to understand what he was implying in the readme, I did what I normally do: learn by doing. First problem I had was finding where the hell to define streams in the first place. The readme says: "5. Navigate to your profile, and click on 'Other Profiles.'" Thanks Mark, but this is a bit convoluted in Movable Type. It literally took me 30 minutes to find the last screen in this series:</p>
<p>Navigate to Users<br />
<img src="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/images/Users.jpg" width="480" height="353" alt="Users.png" /></p>
<p>Click on your Username</p>
<p><img src="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/images/Username.jpg" width="480" height="281" alt="Username.png" /></p>
<p>You will see:<br />
<img src="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/images/profiles.jpg" width="310" height="214" alt="profiles.png" /></p>
<p>Click on Other Profiles:<br />
<img src="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/images/OtherProfiles.jpg" width="450" height="315" alt="OtherProfiles.png" /><br /></p>
<p>Click on Add Profiles as needed to add what you wish to your generic Action Stream.</p>
<p>After all of this, you would think <em>easy enough... Just publish, right?</em> Not so quickly, grasshopper. If you click on the Action Stream as in the image above, you will see a stream of your content, assuming the auto checking and updating has been done by the plugin (via the periodic tasks that are run via cron or other methods). See, all of this is actually quite complicated, but if you've been able to go so far as install Movable Type, then I am assuming you can figure this stuff out, too. I have a love/hate relationship with cron because every Unix-y OS seems to implement it slightly differently. If in doubt, always fall back on 'man cron' and 'man crontab.'</p>
<p>The 64 million Dollar question is <em>how</em> to integrate this stream into your blog 'consciousness.' Because I'm lazy and don't like delving <em>too</em> far into documentation (and the fact that documentation is... ahem... limited), I navigated to the example-templates directory that is packaged with the Action Streams zip download. I simply took the action-streams-index.mhtm content and created a new (separate from my running) index template via the templates dialogue in the manage portion of Movable Type.</p>
<p>(Simply click on Create Index template to create your new index)<br />
<img src="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/images/BlogTemplates.jpg" width="480" height="158" alt="BlogTemplates.png" /></p>
<p>What I ended up with is a very basic page that had "imported" and laid out all of the social network content I wanted added to my blog. So far, so good. The big question was how to actually create that flowing "master" page I mentioned at the beginning of this post. With some more help from Aaron, I took the information from the following links and ended up with a template below:</p>
<p><a href="http://yvesluther.name/web-20/2008-04-25/myfeed/">MyFeed</a> from Yves Luther<br />
<a href="http://www.raquo.net/fine-structure/stream/">Order and Action Streams</a> from <a href="http://www.raquo.net/">Nick O'Neill</a><br />
<a href="http://www.richardbenson.co.uk/2008/08/collating-action-streams.html">Collating Action Streams</a> from <a href="http://www.richardbenson.co.uk/">Richard Benson</a><br />
<a href="http://www.richardbenson.co.uk/templates/main_index.txt">Richard Benson's Main Index Template</a> from <a href="http://www.richardbenson.co.uk/">Richard Benson</a></p>
<p>I had to install another plugin to achieve the date ordering I was hoping for. The plugin's name? Order... Very ... convenient (think Dr. Evil talking). Another Mark Paschal <a href="http://markpasc.org/code/mt/order/">plugin</a>. Thank you Mark! (again)</p>
<p>So, finally, with a lot of fiddling and tweaking, I ended up with this mess (find comments in the code to help - a little):</p>
<blockquote>
  <blockquote>
    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;mt:setvar name="mt_author_display_name" value="steven n fettig"&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvar name="mt_author_username" value="shortnameI'mhiding"&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvar name="author_short_name" value="shortnameI'mhiding"&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvar name="past_days" value="5"&gt;</span>
    </blockquote>

    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;mt:setvar name="body_class" value="mt-main-index"&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvar name="main_template" value="1"&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvar name="main_index" value="1"&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvar name="sidebar" value="1"&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvarblock name="title"&gt;&lt;$mt:blogname encode_html="1"$&gt;&lt;/mt:setvarblock&gt;</span>
    </blockquote>

    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;!-- the above block are for defining some variables used in Action Streams related items in the below blocks --&gt;</span>
    </blockquote>

    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;mt:Order limit="40"&gt;<br />
      &lt;MTEntries lastn="5"&gt;</span>
    </blockquote>

    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;mt:OrderItem&gt;<br />
      &lt;$MTEntryTrackbackData$&gt;</span>
    </blockquote>

    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;MTDateHeader&gt;&lt;h2 class="date-header"&gt;Blog Entry for &lt;$MTEntryDate format="%x"$&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/MTDateHeader&gt;</span>
    </blockquote>

    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;div class="entry" id="entry-&lt;$MTEntryID$&gt;"&gt;<br />
      &lt;h3 class="entry-header"&gt;&lt;a href="&lt;$MTEntryPermalink$&gt;"&gt;&lt;$MTEntryTitle$&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;<br />
      &lt;div class="entry-content"&gt;<br />
      &lt;div class="entry-body"&gt;<br />
      &lt;$MTEntryBody$&gt;<br />
      &lt;MTIfNonEmpty tag="EntryMore" convert_breaks="0"&gt;<br />
      &lt;p class="entry-more-link"&gt;<br />
      &lt;a href="&lt;$MTEntryPermalink$&gt;#more"&gt;Continue reading "&lt;$MTEntryTitle$&gt;" &amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;<br />
      &lt;/p&gt;<br />
      &lt;/MTIfNonEmpty&gt;<br />
      &lt;MTEntryIfTagged&gt;<br />
      &lt;div class="entry-tags"&gt;<br />
      &lt;h4 class="entry-tags-header"&gt;Tags:&lt;/h4&gt;<br />
      &lt;ul class="entry-tags-list"&gt;<br />
      &lt;MTEntryTags&gt;<br />
      &lt;li class="entry-tag"&gt;&lt;a href="&lt;$MTTagSearchLink$&gt;" rel="tag"&gt;&lt;$MTTagName$&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;<br />
      &lt;/MTEntryTags&gt;<br />
      &lt;/ul&gt;<br />
      &lt;/div&gt;<br />
      &lt;/MTEntryIfTagged&gt;<br />
      &lt;/div&gt;<br />
      &lt;/div&gt;</span>
    </blockquote>

    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;p class="entry-footer"&gt;<br />
      &lt;span class="post-footers"&gt;<br />
      &lt;MTIfNonEmpty tag="EntryAuthorDisplayName"&gt;<br />
      Posted by &lt;$MTEntryAuthorLink show_email="0"$&gt; on &lt;$MTEntryDate format="%x %X"$&gt;<br />
      &lt;MTElse&gt;<br />
      Posted on &lt;$MTEntryDate format="%x %X"$&gt;<br />
      &lt;/MTElse&gt;<br />
      &lt;/MTIfNonEmpty&gt;<br />
      &lt;/span&gt;<br />
      &lt;span class="separator"&gt;|&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a class="permalink" href="&lt;$MTEntryPermalink$&gt;"&gt;Permalink&lt;/a&gt;<br />
      &lt;MTIfCommentsActive&gt;| &lt;a href="&lt;$MTEntryPermalink$&gt;#comments"&gt;Comments (&lt;$MTEntryCommentCount$&gt;)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/MTIfCommentsActive&gt;<br />
      &lt;MTIfPingsActive&gt;| &lt;a href="&lt;$MTEntryPermalink$&gt;#trackback"&gt;TrackBacks (&lt;$MTEntryTrackbackCount$&gt;)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/MTIfPingsActive&gt;<br />
      &lt;/p&gt;<br />
      &lt;/div&gt;</span>
    </blockquote>

    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;mt:setvarblock name="order_by"&gt;&lt;mt:EntryDate utc="1" format="%Y%m%d%H%M%S"&gt;&lt;/mt:setvarblock&gt;<br />
      &lt;/mt:OrderItem&gt;</span>
    </blockquote>

    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;/MTEntries&gt;<br /></span>
    </blockquote>

    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;!-- The above block is from my original blog main page. The Order plugin tags were added so that Order would calculate the dates and then order the entries as the main page was being built. --&gt;</span>
    </blockquote>

    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;mt:ActionStreams lastn="50"&gt;<br /></span>
    </blockquote>

    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;mt:OrderItem&gt;<br />
      &lt;div class="entry-content"&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvarblock name="stream_service"&gt;&lt;mt:var name="service_type"&gt;&lt;/mt:setvarblock&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvarblock name="thumb_url"&gt;&lt;mt:StreamActionThumbnailURL&gt;&lt;/mt:setvarblock&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvarblock name="stream_title"&gt;&lt;/mt:setvarblock&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvarblock name="stream_description"&gt;&lt;/mt:setvarblock&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvarblock name="entry_id"&gt;&lt;/mt:setvarblock&gt;</span>
    </blockquote>

    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;mt:if name="service_type" eq="steam"&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvarblock name="stream_title"&gt;&lt;$MTStreamActionVar name="title"$&gt;&lt;/mt:setvarblock&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvarblock name="stream_description"&gt;&lt;$MTStreamActionVar name="description"$&gt;&lt;/mt:setvarblock&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:elseif name="service_type" eq="googlereader"&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvarblock name="stream_description"&gt;&lt;$MTStreamActionVar name="annotation"$&gt;&lt;/mt:setvarblock&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:elseif name="service_type" eq="delicious"&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvarblock name="stream_description"&gt;&lt;$MTStreamActionVar name="annotation"$&gt;&lt;/mt:setvarblock&gt;<br />
      &lt;/mt:if&gt;</span>
    </blockquote>

    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;!-- Here we "divide" up the Action Stream services. This helps define the services for use below. This and some of the below code was taken directly from Richard Benson's instructions/recommendations. Below you have code that helps to show icon and titling for each entry. --&gt;</span>
    </blockquote>

    <blockquote>
      <span style="font-size: 9px;">&lt;li class="hentry service-icon service-&lt;mt:var name="service_type"&gt;"&gt;<br />
      &lt;span class="stream-meta"&gt;@ &lt;mt:StreamActionDate format="%H:%M"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:StreamAction regex_replace="$name_regex",""&gt;<br />
      &lt;div class="stream-extra-description"&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:if name="thumb_url"&gt;<br />
      &lt;div class="stream-extra-thumbnail"&gt;<br />
      &lt;a href="&lt;$MTStreamActionURL$&gt;" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src='&lt;mt:var name='thumb_url'&gt;' /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;<br />
      &lt;/div&gt;<br />
      &lt;/mt:if&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:if name="stream_description"&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:if name="stream_title"&gt;<br />
      &lt;h3&gt;&lt;mt:var name='stream_title'&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;<br />
      &lt;br /&gt;<br />
      &lt;/mt:if&gt;<br />
      &lt;h5&gt;&lt;mt:var name='stream_description'&gt;&lt;/h5&gt;<br />
      &lt;/mt:if&gt;<br />
      &lt;/div&gt;<br />
      &lt;/li&gt;<br />
      &lt;br /&gt;<br />
      &lt;/div&gt;<br />
      &lt;mt:setvarblock name="order_by"&gt;&lt;mt:StreamActionDate utc="1" format="%Y%m%d%H%M%S"&gt;&lt;/mt:setvarblock&gt;<br />
      &lt;/mt:OrderItem&gt;<br />
      &lt;/mt:ActionStreams&gt;<br />
      &lt;/mt:Order&gt;</span>
    </blockquote>
  </blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>Oh, what a mess it is! BUT, it comes very close to finally getting my main page to where I want it. It took hours (and days) to compile all of this and relies on the hard work and advice of the others listed in the links above. The mess still is such that I don't have a collation of the items within a given date - i.e. I can't figure out how to create a date header for a given grouping of items that fit within that date and/or time. As I get closer to solving some aesthetic issues, I'll post them here. I hope that the above helps those struggling through what I didn't understand... These are just my notes on what I struggled with anyway.</p>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Greatness of a State - Which came first, the chicken or the egg?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/000749.php" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008:/mythoughts//1.749</id>
    <entryid>749</entryid>

    <published>2008-09-11T16:19:04Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-11T16:19:01Z</updated>

    <summary>
business, business</summary>
    <author>
        <name>steven n fettig</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Thoughts &apos;n Rants" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="links-of-interest" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Walter Ferguson's editorial in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel from September 6, 2008, <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=791504">The state must be willing to take risks to be 'great'</a> fails on so many levels to develop a cogent argument for state intervention, it took me three tries to read the entire piece. My absolute favorite piece is the ridiculously misleading portion of the article that mentions Denmark as a leader:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>"Looking for a role model? You’d do worse than Denmark. Forbes named that country the best in the world for business. According to the magazine, Denmark has public policies that foster low inflation, low unemployment, low taxes, free trade, innovation, protection of intellectual property and the development of technology. In operating their businesses, it is worth noting the Danes are energy independent through wind power for electricity and technologies that convert pig blubber to heating oil."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>No, Mr. Ferguson, it would be hard to make the United States or any State more inept and bureaucratically rigid as Denmark. Stagnant population growth (0.295%), low immigration (a measure of a country's desirability for finding new opportunities), and marginal tax rates for middle income (by US standards) reaching over 63% make Denmark a very, very poor example, indeed. I lived south of Denmark for over a year and every Dane I had ever met, whether in Germany or Denmark directly, complained about the ridiculous tax structure that afforded little upward movement for the average citizen, which limited their ability to pursue individual, productive desires and interests. Think of it this way, until mid July of each year, you will have spent the previous months paying your dues to the State. It is only after July that the money you have worked hard earning is actually yours. The motivation to work harder and/or be more creative is nullified by the fact that whatever extras you do earn, most of that will go to the State.</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>"Sorensen, who graduated from business school in Copenhagen, found himself earning the equivalent of more than $100,000 before he was 30 - and paying 63 percent of it in taxes...'When you are at 63 percent tax, you don't look forward to the evaluation with the boss to get a raise," Sorensen said. "You look for more vacation or a training course in the tropics - something that you get the full benefit of.'" (<a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/12/05/business/labor.php">High income taxes in Denmark worsens a labor shortage</a> - <a href="http://www.iht.com/">International Herald Tribune</a>)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Denmark's low poverty level and unemployment is masked by the fact that the State doles out money and "jobs" to persons by earmarking huge portions of the working class's income towards those people. It is similar to the idea that there were no unemployed in the socialist/communist Soviet Union. While statistically true, as they say, there are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.</p>
<p>Mr. Ferguson should have stopped writing there. His idea that, "Wisconsin must seek to define those industries or technologies that are crucial for future economic development. The state should then push development of those industries or technologies through the full benefit of public policy instruments and expedient action..." is absolute nonsense. The government - i.e. no governing body, nor State institution - has ever been successful at guessing which ideas will become the next commercial hits. There have been cases where state fostered development of technologies has eventually reached the public and been the catalyst for new opportunities. GPS and Cellular Telephony are two examples. The state was working for a solution to a logistical problem in both of these cases and hadn't foreseen the possibility that your average citizen would find a use for these products - vis a vis mobile phones and in-car navigation systems. This is very different than saying the State should decide which new ideas/technologies are desirable and subsidize them. Let me put it this way: a product was developed because there was a specific, tangible need. Said product was then applied to unknown or unforeseen needs. This is not the same as saying <em>we don't know what the need is for technology xyz, but we're going to subsidize it anyway.</em></p>
<p>It is surprising that as a consultant and former executive at two Silicon Valley companies, Mr. Ferguson is confused that infrastructure and legal consistencies - i.e. safe and reliable transportation, communication, legible/understandable laws etc. - are the same as providing bureaucratically driven "vision" to business development. Let me say this as a businessperson: leave me alone. Give me a consistent low tax burden and easy-to-navigate rules and regulations and I will provide the success you and your visionaries think the State is there to provide. Furthermore, the State does nothing more than muddle the playing field and cannot be held accountable for the inevitable mistakes it <strong>will</strong> make. The markets I and my business colleagues serve are very swift at telling us whether or not we are heading in the right direction. A measure of responsibility is handed down by way of business growth or shrinkage. We don't need more "help" from the State. Sure, there are plenty of us that wish for handouts and I believe those of us who do are not only lazy, but ignorant of the long term damage handouts do to any free market system. Socialism in its grand form - i.e. central planning - has had its day in the Soviet Union and modern day China. It lost the battle and will continue to lose the battle because markets and people's desires cannot be planned and they cannot be foretold by some any visionary - from the State or elsewhere.</p>
<p>By the way, all of the "subsidized employee training, property tax concessions, low or interest-free loans..." are patently unfair. Why are we being slapped with the financial responsibility for supporting your new wave of innovation just because our companies and our staff have been successful and providing a product to the market that is of obvious desire? Where do we stand when it comes to fostering growth and success? In your scheme of investing in future technologies, nowhere. You seem to forget that those new industries you wish to "help along" will not only stand on the shoulders of those who have <em>already</em> succeeded, but trample them to the ground through the process of recklessly transferring away from them what they have rightfully earned for themselves and need for future investment. Shame on you for suggesting such a thing.</p>
]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Meet your (and my) Cousins, Freddie and Fanny</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/000748.php" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008:/mythoughts//1.748</id>
    <entryid>748</entryid>

    <published>2008-09-10T15:28:06Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-10T15:28:05Z</updated>

    <summary>
business</summary>
    <author>
        <name>steven n fettig</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="National Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="links-of-interest" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A coworker came into my office yesterday afternoon and asked what I knew and/or thought of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae being taken over by the government. Oh god... here we go again, and I was gonna' get mad. I hate - as much as anyone can hate anything - when the government steps into a situation and cleans up a mess of someone else's making. Except in the case of Freddie and Fannie, the idea that the government was "stepping in" wasn't so clear. So, I took a deep breath, tried to tell him what I knew of the history of both organizations (i.e. that they were created to give out and/or support people who would have trouble getting loans for homes from private institutions) and what seems to have been the reason why the Treasury Department decided to step in and "seize" their business operations. (I was and am angry because yet again, the average taxpayer is going to be financially responsible for devastatingly inept fiscal management and no one will be truly held accountable for making poor choices - i.e. let financial ruin of many of those involved ensue.)</p>
<p>This morning, I open up my news reader (these days, <a href="http://www.google.com/reader/">Google Reader</a>) and see a blog entry over at <a href="http://cafehayek.typepad.com/">Cafe Hayek</a> from Russell Roberts on this very issue. Here is a taste:<br /></p>
<blockquote>
  "Once upon a time, Fannie and Freddie were partners in a business. Well, it wasn’t exactly a business. It was almost a charity. Not quite. It was sort of a government agency. Or maybe it was all three together. When Fannie and Freddie talked to investors, they acted like a business. When they talked to the government regulators, they acted like a government agency." (<a href="http://cafehayek.typepad.com/hayek/2008/09/who-is-to-blame.html">Who is to blame? by Russell Roberts</a>)
</blockquote><br />
Russell nails it better than I could have. Thanks to him to not only explaining a few details of the Freddie/Fannie debacle, but also for making the topic entertaining.
]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Opportunity Dashed by Communication Litmus Test</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/000747.php" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008:/mythoughts//1.747</id>
    <entryid>747</entryid>

    <published>2008-09-09T22:19:35Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-09T22:19:40Z</updated>

    <summary>
business</summary>
    <author>
        <name>steven n fettig</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="lifeGeneral" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This morning, I had the opportunity to interview a seemingly wonderful young lady. Lately, the interview routine has been a bit stifled with the requisite <em>can't wait to start work</em> and the inevitable <em>it's Monday and I'm sick</em> follow up. We are seeing a lot of good people these days, but at the end of the day, people will be people and interviewing is like playing paintball - the object of the game is to not get painted (too much, that is). So, we dance and lie and sprinkle in some truth to present a picture of promise.<br />
Years ago, I ditched the traditional interview routine for one that assumes the person in front of me is not going to tell me everything I want to know and it would be best to simply try to learn a bit about the person in front of me. (We use staffing agencies to do the background and work history heavy lifting, so people should have already gone through some type of vetting process.) My hope is not only to put a story and face with a name, but get a feel for the person's personality, including likes, dislikes and general attitude.<br />
I guess it could be argued that such types of interviews are unlikely to tell you whether or not to start a person. There must be psychological and statistical testing that you can apply to a series of questions to know whether or not someone is going to work out for a given position. Perhaps... Perhaps. I would argue that your rate of success - i.e. finding the right person - is going to be no better than following a basic background check process and throwing darts at the names of the resultant applicants. Given time, I would love to do the experiment and see what the success rate is (although, then we would also have to ask, <em>what scenario implies <strong>success</strong><span style="font-style: normal;">?).<br />
In the mean-time, I have chosen to ask the question, do</span> I <span style="font-style: normal;">want to work with you - why and why not? The way I answer this question is to ask people about themselves and what they do. What about you makes you, you? Some people naturally open up and others are quiet. Some keep me laughing and others make me look at my watch hoping for a quick end to this painful experience (by the way, usually a personnel/HR manager sees people all the time and going beyond one or two word answers can really help endear yourself towards that person). If the method is not successful (I really don't know, as I haven't tracked the statistics and I would venture that my gut reaction is going to be in my favor), it is at least interesting and even entertaining.<br />
Today, however, was one of those days where the positive mannerisms and initial responses of the interviewee were not enough to overcome a grave issue that creates a negative undercurrent in our job market. The woman's primary language was obviously not English, as her thick accent gave that away. Not a problem. I actually like accents and it is likely that someone with one has an interesting story to tell as to how they ended up here, in southeastern Wisconsin. The problem is that besides the accent, there was a gulf in understanding between what I was asking and the responses I received.<br /></span> What did you do in your last job?</em> Was met with, <em>yes...<br /></em> <em>No... um, what I'm asking you is what you did before you worked for ___?</em> Smile... pause... <em>yes...</em><br />
Okaaayyy. Moving on.<br />
I tried to find another way of phrasing the question and approached the question a few different ways a few sentences later. Sometimes by not getting a sensible response you find that there are other, easier ways of phrasing a question. We are not looking for PhDs here. A basic, I would guess, 3rd grade level of English is all that is needed. <em>Where did you last work?</em> definitely falls within that expectation.<br />
The communication litmus test - a subtle component of my interview - was failed miserably. Despite having the positive mannerisms and cogent responses to my first series of questions, a simple question tipped the balance negative - and quickly. In my eyes, people who have been in the US for a short period of time, say less than a year, get a pass on not understanding a question like <em>where do you work?</em> If you have been here for longer, though, and don't understand, there is a problem There is a big problem. Basic communication skills - i.e. talking to your community member - forms the foundation of a successful life. (This is assuming you don't wish to live like a hermit in the mountains.) Too many people are content with the idea that there is no primary language in the US and to each his own. As far as what you do in your free time is concerned, I agree. The moment, however, you wish to engage in society, you need to be able to communicate. You cannot ever expect to <em>progress</em> without doing so. Perhaps you will get by, but progress towards something greater (which is why I assume you made the effort to come here in the first place), you will not. I feel sorry for people in this situation. Either they are there because someone lied to them and told them it was not important or they are too naive to realize the damage they cause themselves by not realizing how important basic language skills are to succeeding. There will always be those around who are biased or don't like you because of who you are, the way you dress, or how you talk. Bigots and idiots abound. But, without the ability to talk back and defend yourself, you can never hope to overcome this. Never. That is an opportunity dashed, among many others.</p>
]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Exploding heads; politics</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/000746.php" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008:/mythoughts//1.746</id>
    <entryid>746</entryid>

    <published>2008-09-09T01:34:57Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-09T01:34:56Z</updated>

    <summary>I&apos;m trying to learn to blog &quot;shortly,&quot; I&apos;ll call it. Even though, that&apos;s not the right word, nor is it used correctly in any way here. My head is about to friggin&apos; explode. Just because you want a poor family to receive health insurance such that your next visit to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>steven n fettig</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Local Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="National Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm trying to learn to blog "shortly," I'll call it. Even though, that's not the right word, nor is it used correctly in any way here.</p>
<p>My head is about to friggin' explode.</p>
<p>Just because you want a poor family to receive health insurance such that your next visit to the doctor does not drive them further into the poor house, it does not follow <span style="font-style: italic;">necessarily</span> that handing said responsibility to the government will solve the problem.</p>
<p>You state that you wish to help people in need, that we all need to sacrifice. We all need to be willing to give of our excesses. And I agree. That is a motto to live by. Whether or not it is because you believe in Jesus or Karma, giving is good. It does not follow, however, that it is the job of government to manage said transfers of money.</p>
<p>You wish for adequate <span style="font-style: italic;">this</span>, fair <span style="font-style: italic;">that</span>, and equitable practices and yet you deem a system whereby coercion is used to subjugate everyone to a <span style="font-style: italic;">planned</span> order of life that follows your every whim is the manner in which to wish to achieve your goals is adequate, fair, and equitable.</p>
<p>You condemn one side for their voracious taking of civil liberties in the name of protecting our borders, yet you rot our internal system that has created the wealth you depend on with ideology that says fair is not fair and just means doing what <span style="font-style: italic;">you</span> think is right.</p>
<p>You're an idiot.</p>
]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>B &amp; W Photography - How far we have come</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/000745.php" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008:/mythoughts//1.745</id>
    <entryid>745</entryid>

    <published>2008-09-09T01:04:06Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-09T01:04:06Z</updated>

    <summary> The girls II Originally uploaded by steven n fettig I&apos;ve been trying to slowly plow through the three book series The New Ansel Photography Series and finally landed on The Negative (Book 2) yesterday. Today, I came across the following section that made me really sit back and think:...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>steven n fettig</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Thoughts &apos;n Rants" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="lifeGeneral" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="photography" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/">
        <![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;">
  <br />
  <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevenfettig/2838047713/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3063/2838047713_a76eb068d1_m.jpg" alt="" style="border: solid 2px #000000;" /></a><br />
  <br />
  <span style="font-size: 0.9em; margin-top: 0px;"><br />
  <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevenfettig/2838047713/">The girls II</a><br />
  <br />
  Originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/stevenfettig/">steven n fettig</a><br /></span>
</div>I've been trying to slowly plow through the three book series <em>The New Ansel Photography Series</em> and finally landed on <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Negative-Ansel-Adams-Photography-Book/dp/B000GZCV8I/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1220921293&amp;sr=8-1"><em>The Negative (Book 2)</em></a> yesterday. Today, I came across the following section that made me really sit back and think:<br />
<blockquote>
  Crystals of silver halide that are exposed to light are "triggered" so that they will reduce to black particles of metallic silver during development. On exposure, the light produces an invisible <em>latent image</em> composed of crystals that will form image silver when developed, but have not yet undergone any detectable change. Portions of the film which have been exposed to great amounts of light yield a considerable deposit of reduced silver upon development, referred to as a higher <em>density</em>; areas of film exposed to less light yield less silver, or lower density. Thus the image on film is <em>negative</em>, dark areas of which correspond to bright areas of the subject. When printed, the dense areas of the negative give relatively little exposure to the paper and produce a light area on the print, and the low negative densities produce dark print areas. Thus a second reversal occurs that re-establishes the original relationships of lighter and darker values.
</blockquote><br />
I had to read the above because I was confused by two things. One, what the hell did he just write??? I'm not that far out of college that I can no longer read technical writing, but the second bit of confusion caused a bit of the generic first. Second, I couldn't figure out how colors were produced out of crystals of silver halide, etc. It took a few seconds for me to realize that Adams was only referring to black and white film/photography. I had <em>forgotten that I was reading a book on the <strong>negative</strong></em>. Such is my world paradigm that despite the fact I think and talk about shooting film from time to time, it escaped me - if only for a moment - that I was reading about the development of a negative for <em>film</em> photography.<br />
I took a few moments to step back and think about the photo I had just posted to <a>flickr</a> last night. The original photo was shot in color and I was having a hard time dealing with the colors, so I decided to convert it to black and white. With the flick of a <em>mouse</em>, voilà, black and white it is. With a few adjustments, I was relatively happy. (Frankly, I would have liked to have spent 20 minutes or so in Photoshop really getting into the nitty gritty of adjusting shadows, etc, but the day was drawing to a close and this was simply <em>good enough</em>.)<br />
Twenty seconds of click-this-click-that. None of this silver halide light exposure triggering.<br />
I usually accept my paradigm as is, but tonight I laughed and thought, <em>how far we've come...</em><br clear="all" />

<div class="posttagsblock"><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/photography" rel="tag">photography</a></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>My favorite post 2008 convention article</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/archives/000744.php" />
    <id>tag:stevenfettig.com,2008:/mythoughts//1.744</id>
    <entryid>744</entryid>

    <published>2008-09-06T23:49:11Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-06T23:49:10Z</updated>

    <summary>A Tale of Two Conventions (Tim Cavanaugh - Reason Magazine) But the rules have changed. Who could have guessed that the first black man running as a major-party presidential candidate would be battling accusations that he&apos;s an elitist who&apos;s had life too easy? It&apos;s almost as weird as the second...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>steven n fettig</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="National Politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://stevenfettig.com/mythoughts/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/128629.html">A Tale of Two Conventions</a> (Tim Cavanaugh - Reason Magazine)</p>
<p<blockquote>But the rules have changed. Who could have guessed that the first black man running as a major-party presidential candidate would be battling accusations that he's an elitist who's had life too easy? It's almost as weird as the second woman running for vice president getting flak for being insensitive about women's issues.</blockquote><br /></p>
]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
